[translatable text] [howto help] [printable version] [Readers' Comments]
DGMarkt Consultation 2000PbT ConsultantsGünther SchölchBrian KahinEuroLinuxGI e.V.

CEC Software Patent Consultation 2000 Submissions: IBM

an anonymous patent lawyer from the patent department of IBM applauds, demands that the current practise of the European Patent Office should be codified, that Art 52 EPC need not be changed, that however the TRIPS agreement requires an interpretation that makes %(q:software technology) patentable while business methods should not be patentable, because they do not constitute a field of technology of their own and they do not contribute to the technical progress of software technology

author:
IBM
Date of Submission:
2000
files:
ibm.pdf and local copy



[ European Consultation on the Patentability of Computer-Implementable Rules of Organisation and Calculation (= Programs for Computers) | PbT Consultants 2001: Summary Report on EU Software Patentability Consultation | Günter Schölch: Comments on the Consultation Paper | CEC Software Patent Consultation 2000 Submissions: IBM | Eurolinux Alliance 2000-12: Submission to the EC Consultation on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Rules of Organisation and Calculation (Programs for Computers) | German Informatics Corporatists worried about Systematics of Patent Law: GI Position Paper on Patentability of Computer Implementable Rules of Organisation and Calculation ]

http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eukonsult00/ibm/index.en.html
© 2003/09/18 (2000/20/00) Workgroup