[translatable text] [howto help] [printable version] [Readers' Comments]
DGMarkt Consultation 2000PbT ConsultantsGünther SchölchBrian KahinEuroLinuxGI e.V.

CEC Software Patent Consultation 2000 Submissions: Maitland Kalton

Louis Joseph, senior IP consultant of Kalton, a British Internet company, explains what awkward interpretation of the law the EPO has given and how illogical and contrary to the spirit of the law its argumentatio concerning computer programs as such is. The EPO did this in order to accomodate as well as it could the strong needs of the software industry for protection. Software companies will only invest in a place where intellectual property is sufficiently protected. If Europe doesn't make software patentable, they will go to the US.

author:
Maitland Kalton
Date of Submission:
2000-12-14
files:
kalton.pdf and local copy



[ European Consultation on the Patentability of Computer-Implementable Rules of Organisation and Calculation (= Programs for Computers) | PbT Consultants 2001: Summary Report on EU Software Patentability Consultation | Günter Schölch: Comments on the Consultation Paper | CEC Software Patent Consultation 2000 Submissions: Maitland Kalton | Eurolinux Alliance 2000-12: Submission to the EC Consultation on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Rules of Organisation and Calculation (Programs for Computers) | German Informatics Corporatists worried about Systematics of Patent Law: GI Position Paper on Patentability of Computer Implementable Rules of Organisation and Calculation ]

http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eukonsult00/kalton/index.en.html
© 2003/09/18 (2000/12/14) Workgroup